Calcutta High Court
CO/545/2022 of BANI RAHA Vs PURNIMA MITRA AND ORS on 29 September 2026
Court No. 2 pp C.O. 545 of 2022 Bani Raha vs. Purnima Mitra & Ors. Mr. Samrat Chakraborty … for the petitioner. Mr. Bhaskar Chakraborty ....for the opposite party nos.2 to 6. 1. The present petition has been filed seeking direction for expeditious hearing filed under
29.09.2026
Court No. 2
pp
C.O. 545 of 2022
Bani Raha
vs.
Purnima Mitra & Ors.
Mr. Samrat Chakraborty
… for the petitioner.
Mr. Bhaskar Chakraborty
....for the opposite party nos.2 to 6.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed seeking direction for expeditious hearing filed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C. and under Order 39 Rule 7 of C.P.C. in Title Suit No.367 of 2013 pending before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) 1st Court at Barasat, North 24- Parganas.
2. Upon filing of this petition a report was called from the learned Trial Court. Trial Court has sent a detailed report dated 28th August, 2026 duly forwarded by the learned District Judge.
3. Perusal of the report indicates that, in fact, it is the plaintiff himself who is responsible for delay.
4. This Court does not appreciate the conduct of the petitioner for seeking expeditious disposal whereas he himself was at fault for delay in taking steps.
5. The Court does not find any reason to pass any direction as the petition is dismissed.
6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, duly applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)