Calcutta High Court

CRM(M)/2287/2026 of SURAJ PASWAN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No.35. D/L.488. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (M) 2287 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Liluah Police Station case no. 211 of 2024 dated 22.04.2024

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

29.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.488. Rakib (Allowed)

CRM (M) 2287 of 2026

In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Liluah Police Station case no. 211 of 2024 dated 22.04.2024 under Sections 363/365 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.

And In the matter of : Suraj Paswan

……Petitioner. Mr. Dev Kumar Sharma

.....for the Petitioner. Mr. Satya Prakash Shaw

.....for the De-facto complainant. Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, Ld. APP Mr. L. Vishal Kumar Mr. Sanjib Das

……for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submit that pursuant to the earlier direction evidence of the victim is complete. Attention of the Court is drawn to the evidence of the victim. Learned advocate appearing for the de-facto complainant do not opposes the prayer for bail. Learned advocate appearing for the State has also relied upon the evidence of the victim. There are changed circumstances which I find. Having regard to the same, I am of the view that further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. As such, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. As such, the petitioner, namely, Suraj Paswan shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty

2 Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under POCSO Act, Howrah. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of Howrah without prior permission of the learned Special Court. Thus, CRM (M) No. 2287 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead