Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2292/2026 of ROHIT @ MOINIMUDDIN MOLLA @ ROYMUDDIN MOLLA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 29 September 2026
Court No.35. D/L.489. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (M) 2292 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Dum Dum Police Station case no. 230 of 2023 dated 12.05.2023
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
29.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.489. Rakib (Rejected)
CRM (M) 2292 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Dum Dum Police Station case no. 230 of 2023 dated 12.05.2023 under Sections 366A/370A/372/373/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3/4/5/7/9 of the Immoral Trafficking Prevention Act, 1956 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
And In the matter of : Rohit @ Moinimuddin Molla @ Roymuddin Molla
……Petitioner. Mr. Subhon Mazumder Mr. Md. Amanulla Molla Mrs. Kalpita Paul
.....for the Petitioner. Mr. Dr. Pradipp Kr. Banerjee, Ld. APP Ms. Nabanita Chatterjee
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for more than six months, other accused persons have been released on bail. It is submitted that considering the locus of the present petitioner in respect to other accused persons, petitioner should be released on bail. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS. I have taken into account the complicity of the present petitioner which is of a trafficker. Having considered the same, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
2 Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (M) 2292 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)