Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3067/2026 of SWARNENDU CHOWDHURY Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 29 September 2026
no. 27 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM ( A ) 3067 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with English Bazar PS Case no. 1336 of 2025 dated 25.06.2025 u/s 316(2)/319(2)/336(2)/338/340(2)/61(2)/318(4) of the BNS .
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
29.09.2026 Serial no. 27 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (A) 3067 of 2026
In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with English Bazar PS Case no.
of dated 25.06.2025 u/s 316(2)/319(2)/336(2)/338/340(2)/61(2)/318(4) of the BNS .
-And-
In the matter of : Swarnendu Chowdhury
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Kazi M. Rahman
… for the petitioner(s)
Mr. Gouranga Kr. Das, ld. APP Mr. Sourendra Betal Mr. Arka Naha
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been foisted with the criminal case on the basis of act and actions which were at the behest of his father. The petitioner is innocent and his liberty should not be jeopardized. State produces the case diary. I have taken into account the forged deed wherein both the father of the petitioner as the land owner made his signature and the petitioner made his signature as the developer.
Having considered the fact of conspiracy which is the case of the prosecution, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the present petitioner. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3067 of 2026 is dismissed. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)