Calcutta High Court

CO/3426/2026 of NIRMALYA DAS @ NIRMALLYA DAS Vs SOHINI DAS on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Ct. No.- 6 Aritra C.O. 3426 of 2026 Sri Nirmalya Das @ Nirmallya Das Vs. Smt. Sohini Das Mr. Anindya Sundar Das Mr. Shounak Ghosh Mr. Suman Halder Ms. Paramita Mondal Ms. Rebika Sultana ….for the petitioner This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

D/L- 23 29/09/2026 Ct. No.- 6 Aritra C.O. 3426 of 2026

Sri Nirmalya Das @ Nirmallya Das Vs. Smt. Sohini Das

Mr. Anindya Sundar Das Mr. Shounak Ghosh Mr. Suman Halder Ms. Paramita Mondal Ms. Rebika Sultana ….for the petitioner

This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the husband praying for a direction upon the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track, 4th Court at Alipore to dispose of Matrimonial Suit No.3340 of 2022 expeditiously. The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the mediation has already failed. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed there is no necessity to direct issuance of any notice upon the opposite party. However, the learned advocate for the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with this order upon the opposite party or the learned advocate representing the opposite party before the learned trial judge. In the light of the submissions made by the learned advocate for the petitioner, CO 3426 of 2026 stands disposed by requesting the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track, 4th Court at Alipore to take up the hearing of the Matrimonial Suit No.3340 of 2022, if the same is otherwise ready for hearing and to make an endeavour to dispose of the same as expeditiously as

2

possible without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided the husband is not in default in complying with any order directing him to pay alimony pendente lite or maintenance. There will be no order as to costs. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead