Calcutta High Court
WPCRC/135/2026 of BISWANATH MONDAL Vs SANDHYA MAITY on 28 September 2026
Court No. 12 Item 19 Sandip WPCRC No. 135 of 2026 In WPA No. 657 of 2023 Biswanath Mondal -Vs.- Sandhya Maity Mr. Bapin Baidya … for the Applicant. Mr. Sk. Rejaul Alam …for the alleged contemnor. The Panchayat Authorities have found that permission for construction of the alleged
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
28.09.2026 Court No. 12 Item 19 Sandip
WPCRC No. 135 of 2026 In WPA No. 657 of 2023 Biswanath Mondal -Vs.- Sandhya Maity Mr. Bapin Baidya … for the Applicant. Mr. Sk. Rejaul Alam …for the alleged contemnor. The Panchayat Authorities have found that permission for construction of the alleged structure had been granted. Accordingly, the matter has been sent to the Sub-Divisional Officer for steps to be taken under Section 23 (5) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973. Under such circumstances, the compliance is recorded and the matter stands disposed of with a direction that the Sub-Divisional Officer to act and proceed in accordance with law, upon taking note of the contention of the gram panchayat. The contempt application is disposed of. The contempt proceedings are dropped accordingly.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)