Calcutta High Court
CRM(R)/106/2026 of UJJAL KR. MONDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 28 September 2026
no. 7 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (R) 106 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Ghola PS Case No. 79 of 2026 dated 24.03.2026 u/s 21 of the Immigration of Foreigners
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
28.09.2026 Serial no. 7 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (R) 106 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Ghola PS Case No. 79 of 2026 dated 24.03.2026 u/s 21 of the Immigration of Foreigners Act.
-And-
In the matter of : Ujjal Kr. Mondal
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Sourov Mondal Mr. M. Debnath Mr. Arijit Bhuiya Mr. Roy Mondal
… for the Petitioner(s)
Mr. Subhajit Chatterjee Mr. Shankar Mukherjee
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that he has documents to substantiate that the petitioner is an Indian citizen. To that effect, learned advocate, intends to draw the attention of the court. Be that as it may, prima facie, there are orders which have been enclosed. It is reflected from the records that for the first time the same are being produced before this court. The petitioner be better advised to produce the same before the learned jurisdiction court in seisin of the case. Learned jurisdictional court would, in such circumstance, conduct an enquiry to take the trial to its logical conclusion
2 within a close proximity of time on the basis of the report submitted by the concerned authorities. In view of the aforesaid, at this stage, I am not inclined to grant bail to the present petitioner. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (R) 106 of 2026 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)