Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3052/2026 of KHURSHID ALOM@ MD. KHURSHID ALI @ KALO Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 28 September 2026
- 425 Court No.35 Rohan (Allowed) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.( A ) 3052 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Shibdaspur Police Station
28.09.2026
Sl. No. - 425
Court No.35
Rohan
(Allowed)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M.(A) 3052 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Shibdaspur Police Station Case No. 147 of 2022 dated 02.10.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 341/448/325/354(B)307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
-And-
In the matter of: Khurshid Alom @ Md. Khurshid Ali @ Kalo …Petitioner Mr. Surajit Basu Ms. Jasika Alam …for the Petitioner Mr. Mr. Gouranga Kr. Das, APP
Mr. Amal Kr. Dutta
Mr. Arka Naha
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner came to know regarding the present case after a notice was received by him.
2. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
3. I find that charge-sheet has already been submitted before the Jurisdictional Court.
4. Having considered the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted, custodial detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted.
5. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, namely, Khurshid Alom @ Md. Khurshid Ali @ Kalo is allowed.
2
6. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer of the case on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper. This would be subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
7. Since charge-sheet has already been submitted before the learned Jurisdictional Court in the year 2022, this order of anticipatory bail would be valid for a period of two weeks.
8. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M. (A) 3052 of 2026 is disposed of.
9. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
10. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
11. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)