Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1870/2026 of RUPAK MONDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 28 September 2026
no. 12 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1870 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with STF (HQ) PS Case no.06 of 2025 dated 14.07.2025 u/s
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
28.09.2026 Serial no. 12 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (M) 1870 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with STF (HQ) PS Case no.06 of 2025 dated 14.07.2025 u/s 111(1)/111(3)/111(4)/111(7)/318(4)/319(2)/336(3)/338/340(1)/340(2)/61(2) of the BNS read with sections 66C/66D of the IT Act and Section 38 of the AAdhar Act, 2016 and Section 14C/14(c) added section 14 of the Foreigners’ Act.
-And-
In the matter of : Rupak MOndal
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty Mr. S. S. Saha
… for the Petitioner(s)
Mr. Kallol Mondal, PP Mr. Pawan Kr. Gupta Mr. Anamitra Banerjee
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that inspite of the earlier order passed in CRM (M) 2802 of 2025 for substantially progressing with the prosecution, till date, charges have not been framed. State opposes the prayer for bail. Having considered that the petitioner is in custody for more than one year two months, I am of the opinion that within the next three months, if the learned trial court is unable to overcome the stage of consideration of charges, in that case, the learned trial court would release the petitioner
2 on bail on such terms and conditions as it would deem fit and proper. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. The learned trial court would adhere to the directions passed above. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (M) 1870 of 2026 is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)