Calcutta High Court
WPA/11105/2026 of ADITI SARKAR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 28 September 2026
Court No.24 SD IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION WPA 11105 of 2026 Aditi Sarkar Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sudipta Dasgupta Ms. Suryatapa Das … for the Petitioner. Ms. Mary Datta Dr. Dinesh Pani … for the State. Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy
S/L 11
28.09.2026
Court No.24
SD
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
WPA 11105 of 2026
Aditi Sarkar
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sudipta Dasgupta
Ms. Suryatapa Das
… for the Petitioner.
Ms. Mary Datta
Dr. Dinesh Pani
… for the State.
Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy
… for SSC.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner in Court today be kept with the records.
2. The petitioner claims that her application for transfer filed offline is pending consideration at the end of the School authority.
3. On a perusal of the documents annexed to the writ petition it does not appear that application for transfer in the prescribed format was filed by the petitioner. There is no proof of filing of the application in the prescribed format before the head of the institution.
4. In view of the above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with the observation that it will be open for the petitioner to make fresh application seeking transfer online in the prescribed format disclosing ground for the same. If the online portal is not functional, then offline application may be filed by the petitioner.
2
5. If such application is made the head of the institution shall consider the same in accordance with the prevailing transfer rules and if the prayer of the petitioner is allowed then necessary steps to forward the application of the petitioner to the District Inspector of Schools in accordance with law shall be taken at the earliest but positively within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.
6. The District Inspector of Schools shall take consequential necessary steps in the matter at the earliest but positively within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of all documents from the school.
7. If the application of the petitioner for transfer is allowed, then necessary consequential steps shall be taken without any further delay.
8. The fate of the petitioner’s application shall be made known to the petitioner.
9. The writ petition stands disposed of.
10. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
11. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)