Calcutta High Court
FA/115/2025 of SANJUKTA DAS JYOTI Vs SATYA RANJAN JYOTI AND ANR on 28 September 2026
J(2) In the High Court at Calcutta Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present: The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya And The Hon’ble Justice Sandip Kumar De FA No. 115 of 2025 + CAN 4 of 2026 Smt. Sanjukta Das (Jyoti) Vs. Sri Satya Ranjan Jyoti (deleted) and Radhika
Form No. J(2)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Present:
The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
And
The Hon’ble Justice Sandip Kumar De
FA No. 115 of 2025
+
CAN 4 of 2026
Smt. Sanjukta Das (Jyoti)
Vs.
Sri Satya Ranjan Jyoti (deleted)
and
Radhika Ranjan Dutta
With
FAT No. 45 of 2025
+
CAN 3 of 2026
Smt. Sanjukta Das (Jyoti)
Vs.
Radhika Ranjan Dutta
For the appellant : Mr. Amlan Kumar Mukherjee, Mr. Rajitlal Maitra, Advs.
For the respondent : Mr. Debasis Chakraborty, Mr. Soham Sen, Advs.
Heard on
: 28.09.2026.
Judgment on
: 28.09.2026.
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.:-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the matters have been settled out of court between the parties in terms of the compromise
2
recorded at paragraph no. 6 of CAN 4 of 2026 and CAN 3 of 2026 filed in connections with the appeals respectively, which are as follows:
6. “i) The plaintiff/appellant has agreed to purchase the ½ portion of the undivided suit property and the defendant/respondent has consented to such proposal.
ii) During the pendency of the appeal between the appellant and the respondent, a registered agreement for sale was executed pertaining to purchase of the ½ undivided portion of the disputed said property involved in the first appeal.
iii) Thereafter the appellant will withdraw the First Appeal as the disputes involved in it have been compromised”.
2. Accordingly, FA No. 115 of 2025 and FAT No. 45 of 2025 are disposed of in terms of the above compromise arrived at between the parties. The above terms be made a part of the decree.
3. CAN 4 of 2026 filed in connection with FA No. 115 of 2025 and CAN 3 of 2026 filed in connection with FAT No. 45 of 2025 are disposed of accordingly.
4. Formal decrees be drawn up in each of the appeals.
5. There will be no order as to costs.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.) I agree.
(Sandip Kumar De, J.)