Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3027/2026 of RAJU DAS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 28 September 2026
- 420 Court No.35 Rohan (Rejected) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.( A ) 3027 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Santipur Police Station
28.09.2026
Sl. No. - 420
Court No.35
Rohan
(Rejected)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M.(A) 3027 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Santipur Police Station Case No. 969 of 2026
dated 02.07.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 85/115(2)/117(2)/109(1)/316(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
-And-
In the matter of: Raju Das
…Petitioner
Ms. Sananda Bhattacharyya
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Aditya Tiwari
Ms. Namrata Chatterjee
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely foisted with the criminal case over a trivial matrimonial dispute.
2. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail. He draws the attention of this Court to the injury report.
3. Injury report reflects that there is a swelling over the right eye which was due to the assault inflicted by the husband and it has been submitted that earlier, there are four criminal cases against the present petitioner. I find that there is a charge-sheet having already been filed in the year 2022 which are under Sections
2 498A/323/506 of the IPC. Subsequently, in another case where charge-sheet was submitted under Section 406 of the IPC.
4. It has been submitted on behalf of the State that this is the second marriage of the present petitioner.
5. Be that as it may, having regard to the fact that there are other two cases also and considering that the petitioner did not amend himself in spite of earlier criminal cases and has assaulted his wife, I am of the opinion that the prayer for anticipatory bail cannot be acceded to.
6. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, namely, Raju Das is rejected.
7. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M. (A) 3027 of 2026 is dismissed.
8. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
9. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)