Calcutta High Court
WPA/25932/2026 of PAPIA DEY Vs INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS on 28 September 2026
ct no. 10 Sl. 07 AGM WPA 25932 of 2026 Papia Dey -Versus- Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Ors. Mr. Debabrata Saha Roy. Mr. Pingal Bhattacharya. … for the petitioner Mr. Sunit Bhunia. …for the UOI Mr. A . K. Nag. Ms. Rishita Sarkar …for the IOCL Ms. Sayani Roy Chowdhury.
05.10.2026
ct no. 10
Sl. 07
AGM
WPA 25932 of 2026
Papia Dey
-Versus-
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
Mr. Debabrata Saha Roy.
Mr. Pingal Bhattacharya.
… for the petitioner
Mr. Sunit Bhunia.
…for the UOI
Mr. A. K. Nag.
Ms. Rishita Sarkar
…for the IOCL
Ms. Sayani Roy Chowdhury.
… for the SBI
Mr. Ritesh Mukar Ganguly.
Ms. Utsa Podder.
… for the respondent no. 12.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The matter has appeared in the list under the heading „To Be Mentioned‟ for correction of the order dated 28th September, 2026.
2. The appearance of the learned advocate recorded in the order dated 28th September, 2026 in respect of the SBI was not recorded inadvertently.
3. Be it recorded that Ms. Sayani Roy Chowdhury, learned advocate represented the SBI on 29th September, 2026 instead of Debashis Saha, Mr. Avirup Roy Sanyal, Mr. Hyotishman Sarkar and Ms. S. Pal, learned advocates.
4. It is also to be corrected that in the third line of paragraph 22 at page 8 “Partnership Deed dated 12.07.2026 (Annexure P1 of the writ petition)/” be added before the word „application‟.
5. In the eleventh line of paragraph no. 23 at page 9 “Bethuadahari” be replaced instead of “Rajapur”.
6. The remaining part of the said order will remain unaltered.
2
7. Let the order dated 28th September, 2026 be read along with today‟s order.
8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.
(Smita Das De, J.)