Calcutta High Court

CRM(M)/1909/2026 of HAZRAT MAHAMMAD @ HAZRAT MAHAMMOD AND ORS. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No.35. D/L. 29. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 1909 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Samsherganj Police Station Case No. 119/2026 dated 22.02.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

28.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 29. Kausik (Allowed)

CRM (M) 1909 of 2026

In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Samsherganj Police Station Case No. 119/2026 dated 22.02.2026 under Sections 110/117(2)/126(2)/303(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

And In the matter of : Hazrat Mahammad @ Hazrat Mahammod & Ors.

……Petitioners.

Mr. Tapodip Gupta

Ms. Usashi Chattopadhyay

……for the Petitioners.

Mr. Subhabrata Chowdhury

Mr. Pritom Banerjee

……for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are in custody for about 4 and half months. Charge sheet has already been submitted. As such, petitioners may be released on bail on any stringent conditions.

State opposes the prayer for bail and emphasizes on the injuries which are reflected in the case diary.

I have taken into account the circumstances of the present case and the fact that charge sheet has been submitted and there are no antecedents reflecting in the Memo of Evidence.

Having considered the aforesaid parameters, on stringent conditions, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail.

As such, petitioners, namely (1) Hazrat Mahammad @ Hazrat Mahammod, (2) Lal Mahammad @ Lal Mohammod, (3) Rafikul Sk @ Rafikul Saikh be enlarged on bail subject to furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned ACJM, Jangipur, Murshidabad.

If on bail, the petitioners shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of Murshidabad without the prior permission of the learned Trial Court.

Additionally, petitioners shall meet with the Officer-in- Charge of Shamsherganj Police Station once in every 10 days for a period of 1 year till the same is modified or waived by the learned Court in seisin of the case.

With the aforesaid observations CRM (M) 1909 of 2026 is allowed.

Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead