Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3050/2026 of SAHIDA BIBI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 28 September 2026
- 423 Court No.35 Rohan (Allowed) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.( A ) 3050 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Belda Police Station Case
28.09.2026
Sl. No. - 423
Court No.35
Rohan
(Allowed)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M.(A) 3050 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Belda Police Station Case No. 247 of 2026
dated 01.07.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 85/115(2)/117(2)/109(1)/89/126(2)/75(2)/76/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
-And-
In the matter of: Sahida Bibi
…Petitioner
Mr. Amitabha Karmakar
Mr. Arup Bhowmick
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Brajesh Jha, APP
Ms. Piyali Chatterjee
Mr. Neel Chakraborty
…for the State
Ms. Reshmi Khatun
Mr. Faiyaj Khan
… for the De-facto Complainant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the mother-in-law who has been implicated because of marital dispute between the informant and her son.
2. Learned advocate appearing for the de facto complainant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
3. Learned advocate appearing for the State has produced the case diary, referred to the statement of the informant as also the injury report.
2
4. Having considered the materials appearing in the case diary, I am of the view that although a case for investigation is made out but custodial detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted.
5. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, namely, Sahida Bibi is allowed.
6. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer of the case on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper. This would be subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
7. The petitioner shall make herself available as and when required by the Investigating Officer of the case.
8. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M. (A) 3050 of 2026 is disposed of.
9. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
10. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
11. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)