Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1952/2026 of TANUSHREE DAS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 28 September 2026
no. 55 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1952 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Swarupnagar PS Cse No. 495 of 2024 dated September 6, 2024 [GR Case No. 3872 of 2024].
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
28.09.2026 Serial no. 55 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (M) 1952 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Swarupnagar PS Cse No. 495 of 2024 dated September 6, 2024 [GR Case No. 3872 of 2024].
-And-
In the matter of : Tanushree Das
… Petitioner(s)
Ms. Sananda Bhattacharyya
… for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Indradip Das Mr. Anirban Kumar Banerjee
… for the State-respondent(s)
Petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 6th September, 2024, i.e., for about two years and till date trial has not commenced. State opposes the prayer for bail. Having regard to the period of detention of the present petitioner who is a lady, I am inclined to release her on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Tanushree Das shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom
2 must be local, to the satisfaction of the ld. ACJM, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas. If on bail, the petitioner shall also make herself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court and shall not leave the district of North 24 Parganas without prior permission of the learned trial court or the court in seisin of the case. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1952 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)