Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1951/2026 of KIRON MALLICK AND ORS. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 28 September 2026
no. 54 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1951 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Labpur PS Cse No. 232 of 2025 dated 05.11.2025 u/s
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
28.09.2026 Serial no. 54 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (M) 1951 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Labpur PS Cse No. 232 of 2025 dated 05.11.2025 u/s 126(2)/115(2)/118(2)/103(1)/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS.
-And-
In the matter of : Kiron Mallick &Ors.
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Antarikhya Basu Mr. Sayan Mukherjee Ms. M. Saha
… for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Brajesh Jha Ms. Nabanita Chatterjee
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody for more than 10 months; charge- sheet has already been submitted before the learned jurisdictional court and other accused persons have been granted bail. State opposes the prayer for bail. I find that the genesis of the case is of dispute relating to feeding of cattle at the field of the others. Having considered the same, I am of the view that further custodial detention of the present petitioners is unwarranted. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is Allowed.
Accordingly, the petitioners viz, [Kiron Mallick, Sazed Khadim, Soyeb Aktar Mallick @ Bapan] shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned ACJM, Bolpur, Birbhum. If on bail, the petitioners shall also make themselves physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court and shall not leave the district of Birbhum without prior permission of the learned trial court or the court in seisin of the case. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1951 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)