Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2281/2026 of SAMIMA BIBI AND ANR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 25 September 2026
no. 3 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 2281 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Farakka PS Cse No. 108 of 2026 dated 22.03.2026 u/s 103(1)/3(5) of the BNS. -And- In the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
25.09.2026 Serial no. 3 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (M) 2281 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Farakka PS Cse No. 108 of 2026 dated 22.03.2026 u/s 103(1)/3(5) of the BNS.
-And-
In the matter of : Samima Bibi &Anr.
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Arindam Chattopdhyay Ms. Lipika Chatterjee Mr. Soumik Dey Ms. Rika Das
… for the Petitioner(s)
Mr. Subrata Mukherjee Mr. Subhendu Sinha Roy Mr. Jnip Bose
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are in custody for about six months. The petitioner no.1 has a child of six years and has been implicated in the case for reasons which are otherwise. Petitioner no.2 is the son of the deceased who according to the prosecution’s case joined hands with the mother to murder his father [the deceased]. State has produced the case diary and opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the materials which are appearing and most of the witnesses have corroborated the factum of the mother and the son having committed the
2 offence. The mode and manner are the same as stated by the witnesses. Having considered the stage of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the present petitioners. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (M) 2281 of 2026 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)