Calcutta High Court
WPA/27295/2026 of PARTHA DANDAPAT Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 25 September 2026
2026 Ct. No. 18 Ab IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 27295 of 2026 Dr. Partha Dandapat Vs. The State of West Bengal and others. --------------- Mr. Sankha Ghosh, Mr. Manujendra Narayan Roy, Mr. Gourav Halder. … for the petitioner. Mr. Pulakesh
25.09.
Ct. No. 18
Ab
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 27295 of 2026
Dr. Partha Dandapat
Vs.
The State of West Bengal and others.
---------------
Mr. Sankha Ghosh,
Mr. Manujendra Narayan Roy,
Mr. Gourav Halder.
… for the petitioner.
Mr. Pulakesh Bajpayee,
Mr. Subit Majumdar.
… for the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today be kept with the records.
2. The petitioner’s prayer for resignation, which he tendered sometime on August 25, 2026 has not yet been considered.
3. The petitioner submits that he is not claiming any pensionary benefits or pension and gratuity from the authorities save and except the GPF, GISS and Leave Salary, if any.
4. The petitioner had rendered service in excess of 10 years and there is no impediment in accepting his resignation by the authorities. Non-consideration of the petitioner’s resignation is without any reason and has been kept pending since August 25, 2026.
5. As held by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Hon’ble
Court in WPST 3 of 2024 (Dr. Samir Rana vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.), there is no such Rule to withhold the resignation tendered by a doctor, unless verification, complaint or any other issue is pending against such doctor. In the instant case, there is no such issue pending and there is no justification to withhold and/or not accepting the resignation of the petitioner. However, as provided for in the Rule, if the mandated one month’s notice is not given, the incumbent is liable to forfeit a month’s salary in lieu of such notice. Admittedly, in this case, the petitioner has not given one month’s notice and has tendered his resignation with immediate effect from August 25, 2026.
6. The respondent no. 2 will consider and accept the resignation and issue a letter to such extent by October 10, 2026 and calculate the amount due and payable, if any, on the afore-stated heads. The said amount will also be released by October 31, 2026, if it be found due and payable.
7. Since the petitioner had tendered his resignation with immediate effect on and from August 25, 2026, without giving the mandated one month’s notice, the petitioner will deposit a sum equivalent to one month’s salary paid to him since his services have not yet been confirmed. Such amount will be deposited by October 25, 2026 whereupon the release order will be
issued.
8. With the afore-stated directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
9. There will be no order as to costs.
10. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.
(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)