Calcutta High Court
WPA/23064/2026 of NAHID ANWAR AND ORS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 25 September 2026
25.09.2026 Ct. No. 2 Mujahid WPA 23064 of 2026 Nahid Anwar & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. N.I. Khan Mr. Rishav Deb Barman Mr. Dilip Kr. Mandal …for the petitioners Mr. Samrat Mukherji Mr. Amlan Kumar Mukherjee Ms. Sabita Roy …for the State 1. Affidavit of
D/L 19
25.09.2026
Ct. No. 2
Mujahid
WPA 23064 of 2026
Nahid Anwar & Ors.
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. N.I. Khan
Mr. Rishav Deb Barman
Mr. Dilip Kr. Mandal
…for the petitioners
Mr. Samrat Mukherji
Mr. Amlan Kumar Mukherjee
Ms. Sabita Roy
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit of service filed. Let it be taken on record.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that his representation dated 24th July, 2026 may be considered and decided by the Principal Secretary, Transport Department. Learned counsel submits that the decision has to be taken by the Regional Transport Authority, Kolkata.
3. The representation was regarding permission to deposit the requisite fee for grant of contract carriage permits of auto-rickshaw in the route no.115 (CIT Padma Pukur (Entally to Saatgachi (Topsia) via CIT Road, Sundari Mohan Avenue Park Circus Maidan, Bridge No.4).
4. Learned counsel for the State has fairly submitted that the concerned officer shall consider
2 and decide the representation expeditiously after giving the parties an opportunity of being heard.
5. In view of the submissions made, let the representation dated 24th July, 2026 be considered and decided by respondent nos. 2 and 4 shall consider and decide the representation after giving the parties an opportunity of being heard in accordance with law. The concerned authority shall also communicate the decision within two weeks.
6. Since the affidavit-in-opposition has not been filed, the averments made in the petition are not deemed to have been admitted.
7. It is also pertinent to mention here, that this court has not gone into the merits of the case and no expression made herein shall tantamount to be an expression on the merits of the case.
8. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
9. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)