Calcutta High Court

CO/3333/2026 of PRABIN KHAN ALIAS TUFO KHAN Vs RAHUL MONDAL AND ORS on 25 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No.6 BP C.O. 3333 of 2026 Prabin Khan alias Tufo Khan -versus- Rahul Mondal & Ors. Mr. Debrup Bhattacharjee Mr. Seven S. Biswas Mr. Siddharth Singh ..for the petitioner This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the defendant praying

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Sl.19 25.09.2026 Court No.6 BP C.O. 3333 of 2026

Prabin Khan alias Tufo Khan -versus- Rahul Mondal & Ors.

Mr. Debrup Bhattacharjee Mr. Seven S. Biswas Mr. Siddharth Singh ..for the petitioner

This application under Article of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the defendant praying for a direction upon the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bongaon, 24 Parganas (North) to dispose of Title Suit No. 5 of 2000 expeditiously. The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the suit is at the stage of cross-examination of P.W.-1. He submits that the next date for further cross- examination of P.W. 1 is fixed on 15th December, 2026. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to issue notice upon the opposite parties. However, the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with this order upon the opposite parties or upon the learned advocates representing them before the learned Trial Judge. In the light of the submissions made by the learned advocate for the petitioner, C.O. 3333 of 2026 stands disposed of by requesting the learned Civil Judge (Junior

Division), Bongaon, 24 Parganas (North) to make an endeavour to dispose of Title Suit No. 5 of 2000 as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties keeping in mind that the suit is pending from the year 2000. There shall be, however, no order as to costs. Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously on compliance of usual legal formalities.

(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead