Calcutta High Court

WPA/26481/2026 of SUPRABHAT DAS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 25 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026 Ct. No. 18 sdas WPA 26481 of 2026 Dr. Suprabhat Das Vs. The State of West Bengal and others. --------------- Mr. Sankha Ghosh Mr. Manujendra Narayan Roy Mr. Gourav Haldar … for the petitioner. Mr. Indadeep Pal Ms. Anyasha Das … for the State. 1. Let affidavit of undertaking

25.09.

Ct. No. 18

sdas

WPA 26481 of 2026

Dr. Suprabhat Das

Vs.

The State of West Bengal and others.

---------------

Mr. Sankha Ghosh

Mr. Manujendra Narayan Roy

Mr. Gourav Haldar

… for the petitioner.

Mr. Indadeep Pal

Ms. Anyasha Das

… for the State.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Let affidavit of undertaking filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

2. The petitioner is a Doctor, who has been working since August, 2017 as General Duty Medical Officer in the cadre of West Bengal Health Services (WBHS) under the respondent authorities, at Murshidabad.

3. The petitioner has thereafter pursued a Post Graduate Course after availing the TR facility from March, 2023 to about March, 2026. The petitioner has also executed an indemnity bond for about Rs. 15 lac and has also given the requisite undertaking to refund balance period money under the bond in terms of the direction of the concerned authority.

4. The petitioner now seeks to pursue higher academics on account whereof he has tendered his resignation by a letter of June 09, 2026.

5. As is imminent from the letter, the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish the amount that may be calculated regarding the balance period of service under the bond.

6. In view of the afore-stated, I direct the respondent no. 2 to take all necessary steps and accept the resignation of the petitioner and release the petitioner upon intimating the amount payable by the petitioner for such release.

7. The petitioner will deposit the said amount with the respondent no. 2 prior to issuance of the release order. The entire exercise should be completed by November 15, 2026.

8. With the afore-stated directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

9. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.

10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead