Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1875/2026 of SAHAJAN KHAN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 25 September 2026
Court No.35. D/L.27. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (M) 1875 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chandipur Police Station case no. 387 of 2025 dated 15.10.2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
25.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.27. Rakib (Allowed)
CRM (M) 1875 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chandipur Police Station case no. 387 of 2025 dated 15.10.2025 under Sections 80/85/103(1) of the Bharaitya Nyaya Sanhits, 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
And In the matter of : Sahajan Khan
……Petitioner. Mr. Pinak Kumar Mitra Ms. Sudarshana Srivastava Ms. Ankita Dutta Mr. Satyam Pandey
.....for the Petitioner. Mr. Amajit De Mr. Rohan Bavishi
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that present petitioner is the husband who has been implicated in the present case as his wife has committed suicide, petitioner is in custody for about nine months, charge-sheet has already been submitted and the unfortunate incident took place after more than six and half years of marriage. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the witnesses including the post-mortem report. Having considered the post-mortem report and the attending materials, I am of the opinion that further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. As such, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.
2 Accordingly, the petitioner, namely, Sahajan Khan shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of Purba Medinipur without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Thus, CRM (M) No. 1875 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)