Calcutta High Court

WPA/26654/2026 of SK. SAFIUL AND ORS. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 25 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Item No.23 sudipta WPA 26654 of 2026 Sk. Safiul & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. N. I. Khan Mr. Dilip Kr. Mandal …for the petitioners Mr. Samrat Mukherjee Ms. Sabita Roy Mr. Amlan Kumar Mukherjee …for the State 1. Affidavit of service filed. Let it be taken

25.09.2026

Court No.2

Item No.23

sudipta

WPA 26654 of 2026

Sk. Safiul & Ors.

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. N. I. Khan

Mr. Dilip Kr. Mandal

…for the petitioners

Mr. Samrat Mukherjee

Ms. Sabita Roy

Mr. Amlan Kumar Mukherjee

…for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Affidavit of service filed. Let it be taken on record.

2. Learned counsel for the State has filed the report of Mr. Himanshu Biswas, IC Nodakhali PS, DDH Police District. Learned counsel submits that upon receipt of a complaint regular surveillance, mobile patrolling and vehicle checking were conducted. Learned counsel also submits that police administration is maintaining strict vigilance to prevent any breach of the peace. Learned counsel further submits that the authority shall take appropriate action against any violation of the Motor Vehicles Act. Learned counsel also submits that the Transport Authority shall also take appropriate action.

2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the same the appropriate directions may be issued.

4. The respondents are directed to take note of the representation of the petitioners dated 15th June, 2026 and consider and decide the same after giving the concerned parties an opportunity of being heard expeditiously in accordance with law.

5. The police authority shall ensure that appropriate action is taken against the violators of the permit.

6. Since the affidavit-in-opposition has not been filed, the averments made in the petition are not deemed to have been admitted.

7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case and no expression made herein shall tantamount to be an expression on the merits of the case.

8. With the above observations the instant petition stands disposed of.

9. All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead