Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2387/2026 of AKASH NAYEK Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 25 September 2026
no. 4 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 2387 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Duttapukur PS Case No. 627 of 2022 dated 27.06.2022 u/s 302/34 of the IPC and sections
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
25.09.2026 Serial no. 4 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (M) 2387 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Duttapukur PS Case No. 627 of 2022 dated 27.06.2022 u/s 302/34 of the IPC and sections 25/27 of the Arms Act.
-And-
In the matter of : Akash Nayek
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. A. Chakraborty Mr. S. S. Saha
… for the Petitioner(s)
Mr. Aditya Tiwari Ms. Namrata Chatterjee
… for the State-respondent(s) Dr. Achin Jana Mr. Prosenjit Ghosh Ms. C. Rustagi
… for the defacto-complainant
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than four years three months and till date, the prosecution, even if after repeated directions, could not complete the evidence of the three witnesses. Learned advocate for the State submits that presently the cross-examination of the first investigation officer is in progress and the second investigating officer is only left to be examined.
Having considered the final stage of the case, I am of the opinion that as a last chance an opportunity be granted to the prosecution. Let the evidence of the prosecution witnesses specifically the examination-in-chief of the second investigating officer be completed by 31st January, 2027. Having considered the stage of the case, at this stage, I am not inclined to grant bail to the present petitioner. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. The learned trial court would adhere to the schedule and will not allow any of the parties to delay the evidence and/or further proceedings of the trial. Accordingly, CRM (M) 2387 of 2026 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Report submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)