Calcutta High Court
CO/3294/2026 of GITANGSHU BANDOPADHYAY ALIAS GITANGSU BANERJEE Vs PROVABATI BANERJEE ALIAS BANDOPADHYAY AND ORS on 25 September 2026
25.09.2026 (AD 30) (S. Banerjee) CO 3294 of 2026 Gitangshu Bandopadhyay @ Gitangsu Banerjee Vs. Smt. Provabati Banerjee @ Bandopadhyay & Ors. Mr. Pinaki Ranjan Mitra …for the petitioner This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Court No. 6 (265719) 25.09.2026
(AD 30)
(S. Banerjee) CO 3294 of 2026
Gitangshu Bandopadhyay @ Gitangsu Banerjee Vs. Smt. Provabati Banerjee @ Bandopadhyay & Ors.
Mr. Pinaki Ranjan Mitra
…for the petitioner
This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the defendant and is directed against an order dated August 19, 2026 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), 1st Court at Howrah in Title Suit No. 4 of 2020. By the order impugned the application filed by the petitioner for examination of the Advocate Commissioner who has conducted an investigation and submitted a report, stood rejected. Pursuant to an order passed under Order 39 Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Code a local inspection was conducted by the learned Advocate Commissioner and she submitted her report before the learned trial judge on September 5, 2023. The learned trial judge specifically recorded that after filing of such report hearing of the injunction application was conducted and only at the belated stage of argument of the suit, the petitioner has come
2 up with an application for praying for examination of the learned Advocate Commissioner. Considering the fact that the Advocate Commissioner submitted her report on September 5, 2023 and the application for examination of the Commissioner was filed sometime in the month of January, 2026, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the learned trial judge. Accordingly, this revisional application stands disposed of.
(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)