Calcutta High Court
CPAN/1728/2025 of PRODYUT HALDER Vs D. BHATTACHARYA, DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, WEST BENGAL SECTOR AND ORS. on 25 September 2026
High Court at Calcutta Ct. No. 38 Special Civil Jurisdiction Sl. No. 37 Appellate Side Contempt Moumita CPAN 1728 of 2025 in WPA 13279 of 2025 Prodyut Halder Vs. Shri D. Bhattacharya, Deputy Inspector General, CRPF Durgapur, Pashchim Bardhaman & Ors. Mr. Debasish Kundu, Adv. Ms. Doyel Dey,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
25.09.2026
In The High Court at Calcutta Ct. No. 38
Special Civil Jurisdiction Sl. No. 37
Appellate Side Contempt Moumita
CPAN 1728 of 2025 in WPA 13279 of 2025
Prodyut Halder Vs. Shri D. Bhattacharya, Deputy Inspector General, CRPF Durgapur, Pashchim Bardhaman & Ors.
Mr. Debasish Kundu, Adv. Ms. Doyel Dey, Adv.
….For the Petitioner Mr. Indrajeet Dasgupta, Adv. Mr. Tapan Bhanja, Adv. Mr. Gourab Karmakar, Adv. …..For the alleged contemnors
Mr. Debasish Kundu, learned Advocate appears for the petitioner.
Mr. Indrajeet Dasgupta, learned Advocate with Mr. Tapan Bhanja, learned Advocate appears for the alleged contemnors.
This is a contempt proceeding arising from an order dated July 2, 2025 read with August 28, 2026.
Today learned Advocates appearing for the alleged contemnors have submitted a compliance report by way of an affidavit, the same is taken on record. Copy has been served upon the learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner in Court today.
2
Annexure ‘b’ to the said compliance affidavit is the reasoned order dated September 1, 2026 which shows that, in compliance of the direction of this Court the candidature of the petitioner has already been forwarded before the Staff Selection Commission (SSC). A relevant document in this regard dated September 16, 2026 is also placed on record separately upon a copy being served upon Mr. Kundu, learned Advocate for the petitioner.
In view of the above, nothing further survives in this contempt proceeding.
In view of the above, this contempt proceeding CPAN 1728 of 2025 stands dropped and closed.
The application CPAN 1728 of 2025 stands disposed of, without any order as to costs.
(Aniruddha Roy, J.)