Calcutta High Court

CRM (NDPS)/2019/2026 of AJAY SHAW Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 24 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No.35. D/L.420. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (NDPS) 2019 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Bizpur Police Station case no. 38 of 2026 dated 09.02.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

24.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.420. Rakib (Allowed)

CRM (NDPS) 2019 of 2026

In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Bizpur Police Station case no. 38 of 2026 dated 09.02.2026 under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act.

And In the matter of : Ajay Shaw

……Petitioner. Mr. Debasis Kar Ms. Paramita Mukherjee

.....for the Petitioner. Mr. Dr. Pradip Banerjee, Ld. APP Mr. Sanjib Das

……for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been implicated on the basis of statement of co-accused and there has been no recovery from the present petitioner. Although, the subject matter of the case relates to alleged recovery of 30.650 kgs of ganja were recovered from the other accused persons. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail. On a specific query from this Court it has been submitted that there are no antecedents reflected in the memo of evidence and the Case Diary do not reflect that there are CDR or money trail of the present petitioner with the other accused persons from whom seizure has been made. Having regard to the same, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

2 Accordingly, the petitioner, namely, Ajay Shaw shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court (under NDPS Act), Barrackpore, North 24 Parganas. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of North 24 Parganas without prior permission of the learned Special Court. Thus, CRM (NDPS) No. 2019 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead