Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1852/2026 of JULI KUMARI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 24 September 2026
Court No.35. D/L. 10. Kausik (Rejected) CRM (M) 1852 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with AJC Bose B Garden Police Station Case No. 209 of 2024 dated
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
24.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 10. Kausik (Rejected)
CRM (M) 1852 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with AJC Bose B Garden Police Station Case No. 209 of 2024 dated 10.11.2024 under Sections 143/93/98/137 of BNS, 2023 read with Section 75/81 of the Juvenile Justice Care and Protection of Children Act, 2015.
And In the matter of : Juli Kumari
……Petitioner.
Mr. Sabir Ahmed
Mr. Dhiman Banerjee
……for the Petitioner.
Mr. Kallol Mondal, Ld. PP
Mr. L. Vishal Kumar
Mr. Arindam Banerjee
….for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for about 1 year and 8 months. There are no materials to suggest that there are admissible evidence so that the petitioner can be charged on the grounds of trafficking.
Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is involved in the racket of trafficking. To that effect, there are money transactions with the principal accused. Documents to that effect has been placed before this Court.
2
Having considered the complicity of the present petitioner in respect of such heinous offence, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (M) 1852 of 2026 is dismissed.
Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)