Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2452/2026 of XXXX Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 23 September 2026
no. 48 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 2452 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Krisnaganj pS Case No 108 of 2026 dated 21.05.2026 u/s 115(2)/126(2)/324(4)/351(2)/3(5)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
23.09.2026 Serial no. 48 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (M) 2452 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Krisnaganj pS Case No 108 of 2026 dated 21.05.2026 u/s 115(2)/126(2)/324(4)/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS and section 12 of the POCSO Act.
-And-
In the matter of : XXX
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Saryati Datta Mr. Amanul Islam Mr. Sourav Mukherjee
… for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Anindya Ghosh Mr. P. Roy
… for the State-respondent(s) Mr. S. Das
… for the defacto-complainant
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 195 days; charges have been framed and the victim and her mother have already been examined. Learned advocate for the defacto-complainant submits that the petitioner is trying to evict the private opposite party who is a widow from the house along with her child. State opposes the prayer for bail and produces the case diary.
I have taken into account the genesis of the dispute and the statement of the victim under section 183 of the BNSS. Having considered that there are family disputes and the petitioner happens to be the grandfather of the minor, I am of the opinion that further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz, XXX shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned Judge, Special Court under POCSO Act, Nadia at Krishnagar. If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned Special court/trial court and shall not leave the district of Nadia without prior permission of the learned Special court/trial court. Accordingly, CRM (M) 2452 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)