Calcutta High Court

CRM(M)/1889/2026 of SANJU @ SANJOY BISWAS @ SANTU BISWAS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No.35. D/L.882. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (M) 1889 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Mogra Police Station case no. 272 of 2025 dated 07.06.2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

23.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.882. Rakib (Rejected)

CRM (M) 1889 of 2026

In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Mogra Police Station case no. 272 of 2025 dated 07.06.2025 under Sections 318(2)/64(2)(m)/316(2)/77/329(4)/117(2)/89/351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

And In the matter of : Sanju @ Sanjoy Biswas @ Santu Biswas

……Petitioner. Ms. Shreyeta Mitra

.....for the Petitioner. Mr. Sayak Chakraborti Mr. Madan Mohan Roy

……for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is presently in custody for about eight months. Petitioner was earlier granted bail in CRM (M) 1463 of 2025, subsequently his bail was cancelled and as such he was taken into custody. Petitioner presently submits that there has been change of circumstances as evidence of the victim is over. Petitioner prays for bail on any stringent conditions. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail, referring to the evidence of the victim and submits that there is corroboration of the victim in respect of the statement under Sections 180 and Section 183 of the BNSS. Having regard to the conduct of the accused/petitioner, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.

2 However, till date only one witness has been examined, if within a period of six months rest of the witnesses are not completed, learned trial Court on stringent conditions will release the petitioner on bail. At this stage, prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (M) 1889 of 2026 is dismissed. Learned trial Court would adhere to the directions passed above. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead