Calcutta High Court

CRM(M)/1850/2026 of SHANKAR @ SANKAR BISWAS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

no. 72 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1850 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Chakdah PSCase No. 877 of 2025 dated 9th August, 2025 u/s 420 of the IPC read with

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

23.09.2026 Serial no. 72 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)

CRM (M) 1850 of 2026

In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Chakdah PSCase No. 877 of 2025 dated 9th August, 2025 u/s 420 of the IPC read with section 14 of the Foreigners Act.

-And-

In the matter of : Shankar @ Sankar Biswas

… Petitioner(s)

Mr. Shabir Ahmed Mr. Shibaji Kr. Das Mr. D. Sarkar Ms. Deblina De

… for the Petitioner(s) Ms. Sreshtha Ghosh Ms. Sanjana Jha

… for the State-respondent(s)

Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than 13 months, charge- sheet has been submitted and three of the witnesses have been examined out of the five witnesses proposed to be examined by the prosecution. State opposes the prayer for bail. Having considered the prescribed punishment and the period of detention of the present petitioner, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Shankar @ Sankar Biswas shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of

Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Kalyani. In this case, the local surety would be an individual who will deposit the title deed of his/her property. If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court and shall not leave the district of Nadia without prior permission of the learned ACJM, Kalyani, Nadia. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1850 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead