Calcutta High Court
CPAN/971/2026 of HARIDAS CHAKRABARTI Vs MANISH SHARMA, BRACH HEAD OF NAIHATI GARIFA BRANCH, INDIA BANK AND OTHERS on 23 September 2026
2026 Itemno.DL 27 Court No. 24 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Special Civil Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. CPAN 971 of 2026 (CAN 1 of 2026) In WPA 23681 of 2025 In the matter of : Haridas Chakrabarti ….Petitioner VS. Manish Sharma & Ors. ….Respondents The
23rd Sept., 2026
Itemno.DL 27
Court No. 24
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Special Civil Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Case No.
CPAN 971 of 2026
(CAN 1 of 2026)
In
WPA 23681 of 2025
In the matter of :
Haridas Chakrabarti
….Petitioner
VS.
Manish Sharma & Ors.
….Respondents
The Petitioner in-person:
Mr. Haridas Chakrabarti
For the Alleged Contemnors :
Ms. Debjani Ghoshal
….Advocate
IN RE : CPAN 971 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner appears in person. He has been heard in details.
2. The petitioner apprehends that the bank may take steps to recover certain amount from his pension account allegedly on the ground of overdrawn payment. Specific case of the petitioner is that he has not received any amount in excess to his entitlement.
3. Learned Advocate representing the bank submits that, as on date, no decision has been taken to recover any amount from the petitioner’s pension amount.
Page 2
4. Affidavit -of -compliance filed by the bank in Court today is taken on record. A copy of the same has been handed over to the petitioner in Court today.
5. It appears therefrom that the petitioner is receiving a sum of Rs. 43,672/- as pension per month. The bank has paid Rs. 3/- in excess to the petitioner every month. The bank may take steps to recover the excess amount at a subsequent stage.
6. As on date, it appears that, there is no cause of action for the petitioner to proceed with the instant contempt petition.
7. Accordingly, CPAN 971 of 2026 stands disposed of.
8. Connected application also stands disposed of.
9. All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
10. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on compliance of all requisite formalities.
( Amrita Sinha, J. )