Calcutta High Court

WPA/24297/2026 of SOURAV MONDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

13 sdas WPA 24297 of 2026 Sourav Mondal Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Kalyan Kumar Bhattacharjee Ms. Sahina Khatun ……. for the petitioner Mr. D. N. Ray, learned G.P. Mr. Guddu Singh Mr. Sourav Halder ……. for the State 1. Let affidavit- of -service, as

23.09.2026

sdas

WPA 24297 of 2026

Sourav Mondal

Vs.

State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Kalyan Kumar Bhattacharjee

Ms. Sahina Khatun

……. for the petitioner

Mr. D. N. Ray, learned G.P.

Mr. Guddu Singh

Mr. Sourav Halder

……. for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Let affidavit-of-service, as filed in Court, be kept on record.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved that he has been demobilized from service. The petitioner has been in service as a Civil Volunteer. These volunteers are used as an additional force to the Kolkata Police, in view of non-availability of the regular Constables in the force. They are, thus, a part of a disciplined force. The guidelines for eligibility, mode of induction, training, duties and demobilization of Civil Volunteers provide in Clause (h) relating to disciplinary matters that in the event a Civil Volunteer is involved in any criminal case, he is liable to be demobilized. On the basis of this provision, the Civil Volunteer has been demobilized as there is a FIR lodged against him by his wife which is not just one of marital discord but also one which relates to torture and assault on the wife and the child. The Rules cannot be moulded to provide benefit to a delinquent volunteer as the Rule provides that if the petitioner is acquitted from the charges, he can be reinstated.

3. In view of the subsisting Rules as applicable to the petitioner, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order of demobilization dated January 31, 2025.

4. With the aforestated directions, the writ petition is dismissed.

5. Dismissal of the writ petition will not deter the rights of the petitioner before any other forum which he may have under the law.

6. There will be no order as to costs.

7. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead