Calcutta High Court
CRM(R)/102/2026 of SANAT DEY Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 23 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.53 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Allowed C.R.M. (R) 102 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Naihati Police Station Case No. 195 of 2026 dated
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
23.09.2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.53
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Allowed C.R.M. (R) 102 of 2026
In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, filed in connection with Naihati Police Station Case No. 195 of 2026 dated 24.06.2026 under Sections 341/323/427/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (G.R. Case No. 4513 of 2026).
And
In Re : Sanat Dey
... Petitioner.
Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee, Mr. Amanul Islam, Mr. Sourav Mukherjee, Mr. Gourav Roy, Ms. Sagnika Banerjee
... For the Petitioner.
Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, APP, Mr. Snehasis Banerjee, Mr. Ushm Garodia
... For the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for one month three days and the incident complained of is on 24.06.2026 and refers to the date of offence as 23.05.2021/24.05.2021. State was specifically confronted on the issue relating to whether any arms have been recovered. Having considered the date on which the offence occurred and the complaint in respect of which the case has been registered and there being no seizures in respect of the Arms Act, I am of the opinion that further detention of the present petitioner in connection with the instant case is unwarranted. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.
Accordingly, the petitioner viz., Sanat Dey shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore. If on bail, the petitioner shall make himself available before the Investigating Officer of the case as and when called for. In case petitioner leaves the State of West Bengal, he shall inform the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore before leaving the State. Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for bail, being CRM (R) 102 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)