Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1826/2026 of JIME SARDAR @ JIMI BABU Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 23 September 2026
Court No.35. D/L. 58. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 1826 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Swarupnagar Police Station Case No. 672 of 2025 dated 11.10.2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
23.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 58. Kausik (Allowed)
CRM (M) 1826 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Swarupnagar Police Station Case No. 672 of 2025 dated 11.10.2025 under Section 21 of the Immigration and Foreigners Act and Section 12 of the Passport Act.
And In the matter of : Jime Sardar @ Jimi Babu
……Petitioner.
Mr. Satadru Lahiri
Mr. Jyotirmoy Talukder
……for the Petitioner.
Mr. Madan Mohan Roy
Mr. Avishek Bhandari
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for more than 11 months. Similarly placed accused person has already been granted bail and although charge sheet and supplementary charge sheet has been submitted but till date charges have not been framed.
State opposes the prayer for bail.
From the charge sheet I find that prosecution has relied upon 10 witnesses. The prescribed punishments are for a fixed period of term.
Having considered that for almost about a year the petitioner is in custody, I am of the view petitioner be released on bail on stringent conditions. As such, petitioner, namely Jime Sardar @ Jimi Babu be enlarged on bail subject to furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned ACJM, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas.
If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of North 24 Parganas without the prior permission of the learned Trial Court.
Additionally, petitioner will furnish the address where he would be residing after being release on bail and meet with the Officer-in-Charge of the local police station once in every fortnight till the trial is completed before the jurisdictional Court.
Accordingly, CRM (M) 1826 of 2026 is allowed.
Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)