Calcutta High Court

CRM(M)/2168/2026 of SUDARSHAN BOR @ BAR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

no. 887 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 2168 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Serampore PS Case No. 367 of 2026 dated 04.07.2026 u/s

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

23.09.2026 Serial no. 887 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)

CRM (M) 2168 of 2026

In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Serampore PS Case No. 367 of 2026 dated 04.07.2026 u/s 140(2)/3(5)/308(2)/324(4)/351(1)/351(3)/351(4) of the BNS.

-And-

In the matter of : Sudarshan Bor @ Bar

… Petitioner(s)

Mr. M. Mahmud Mr. Amitabha Ghosh Mr. Chottu Naskar

… for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Pritam Ray Ms. Triparna Roy Ms. Deblina Bhattacharjee

… for the State-respondent(s)

Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been foisted with the criminal case after the change in administration. The letter of complaint which has been treated to be FIR reflects that the incident occurred on 02.12.2025 and the same was informed to the concerned police station on or about 04.07.2026. State opposes the prayer for bail on the ground that there are antecedents of the present petitioner. I find from the Memo of Evidence submitted by the State that the cases were registered in the months of June and July, 2027.

Having considered the fact that the petitioner is in custody for 75 days, I am of the opinion that further detention of the petitioner is uncalled for. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Sudarshan Bor @ Bar shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the leaned ACJM, Serampore, Hooghly. If on bail, the petitioner shall meet with the Investigating Officer of the case once in every 10 days till the report in final form is submitted before the learned jurisdictional court. Accordingly, CRM (M) 2168 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead