Calcutta High Court

CRM(M)/2183/2026 of VIKRAM PRASAD AND ANR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No.35. D/L. 888. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 2183 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Raniganj Police Station Case No. 249 of 2026 dated 26.06.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

23.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 888. Kausik (Allowed)

CRM (M) 2183 of 2026

In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Raniganj Police Station Case No. 249 of 2026 dated 26.06.2026 under Sections 109/118(2)/124/351(3)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

And In the matter of : Vikram Prasad & Anr.

……Petitioners.

Mr. Suman De

Mr. Dip Dutta

……for the Petitioners.

Mr. Amarta Ghose

Mr. Probal Das

….for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are in custody for 81 days and both the petitioners are not FIR named and has been unnecessarily arrested by the police authorities.

Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary and also referred to the statement of the injured.

I have taken into account the statement of the injured and is of the opinion that further custodial detention of the present petitioners are not warranted.

As such, petitioners be enlarged on bail.

2

As such, petitioners, namely (1) Vikram Prasad, (2) Bikky Prasad be enlarged on bail subject to furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned CJM, Paschim Bardhaman.

If on bail, the petitioners shall meet with the investigating officer of the case once in every 10 days till the report in final form is submitted before the jurisdictional Court. Accordingly, CRM (M) 2183 of 2026 is allowed.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead