Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2227/2026 of MASUD SK @ MASIDUL SK Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 23 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.7 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. C.R.M. (M) 2227 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Suti Police Station Case No. 310 of 2026 dated 29.03.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
23.09.2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.7
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc.
C.R.M. (M) 2227 of 2026
In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, filed in connection with Suti Police Station Case No. 310 of 2026 dated 29.03.2026 under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (Amended), 2012.
And
In Re : Masud Sk. @ Masidul Sk.
... Petitioner.
Mr. Sandip Chakraborty, Mr. Ankan Das, Mr. Kaustav Das, Ms. Payel Das
... For the Petitioner.
Mr. Sagar Saha, Ms. Nayana Mukhopadhyay
... For the State.
Mr. Sayan Mukherjee, Ms. Rimisha Bhadra
… for the de facto complainant.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 29.03.2026 and petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Subsequently, there is change of circumstances as the victim was unable to understand the consequences of her statement before the learned Judicial Magistrate. Learned advocate appearing for the de facto complainant submits that he has instructions not to oppose the prayer for bail. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and produces the case diary.
I have taken into account the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS. However, since there is a change of stand of the victim and her guardian, they would file specific affidavit on the issue before the learned Special Court. Learned Special Court would under the changed circumstances, leniently consider the prayer for bail of the present petitioner. With the aforesaid observations, the application for bail, being CRM (M) 2227 of 2026, is disposed of. Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)