Calcutta High Court

WPA/13916/2026 of NITYAGOPAL SARKAR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No.24 SD IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION WPA 13916 of 2026 Nityagopal Sarkar Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Shuvro Prokash Lahiri Mr. Ankan Mondal Mr. Manmohon Singh Roop Roy … for the Petitioner. 1. Affidavit of service filed by the

S/L 34

22.09.2026

Court No.24

SD

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

WPA 13916 of 2026

Nityagopal Sarkar

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Shuvro Prokash Lahiri

Mr. Ankan Mondal

Mr. Manmohon Singh Roop Roy

… for the Petitioner.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner in Court today be kept with the records.

2. None appears on behalf of the State respondent in spite of service.

3. The petitioner’s prayer seeking higher scale of pay on account of enhancement of his educational qualification in terms of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Special Bench of this Court on 7th February, 2024 in a batch of writ petitions, one of which was WPA 303 of 2023 (Utpal Kanti Karan –Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.) is pending consideration before the respondent authority.

4. Without entering into the merit of the claim of the petitioner, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by directing the District Inspector of Schools to consider the prayer of the petitioner for grant of higher scale of pay in light of the judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Special Bench at the earliest but positively

2 within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.

5. If the prayer of the petitioner to receive higher scale of pay is accepted by the authority, then necessary consequential steps shall be taken without any further delay.

6. Learned advocate for the petitioner is directed to forward a copy of the subject representation along with all supporting documents to the aforesaid respondent at the time of communicating the order of the Court.

7. The writ petition stands disposed of.

8. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

9. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Amrita Sinha, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead