Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/3021/2026 of JANIRUL SHAIKH @ JANIRUL SK AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

no. 32 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM ( A ) 3021 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Raghunathganj PS Case No. 1095 of 2025 dated 02.09.2025 u/s 126(2)/121(1)/132/221/115(2)/117(2)/3(5) of the BNS. -And-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

22.09.2026 Serial no. 32 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)

CRM (A) 3021 of 2026

In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Raghunathganj PS Case No.

of dated 02.09.2025 u/s 126(2)/121(1)/132/221/115(2)/117(2)/3(5) of the BNS.

-And-

In the matter of : Janirul Shaikh @ Janirul Sk &Anr.

… Petitioner(s)

Mr. Shraman Sarkar Md. Tehasin REja Ms. G. Gurang

… for the petitioner(s)

Mr. Kaustav Shome Mr. Shoumilya Mazumder

… for the State-respondent(s)

Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been foisted with the present criminal case as they were at the hospital after the schedule hours fixed by the administration of the said hospital. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that when the petitioners were resisted and/or objected by the security – the security was assaulted severely. I have taken into account the Memo of evidence and the issue relating to the dispute.

Having considered the same, I am of the opinion that custodial detention of the present petitioners is unwarranted. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is Allowed. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners [Janirul Shaikh @ Janirul Sk and Rahul Sk] be released on anticipatory bail subject to the satisfaction of the arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is still in progress, the petitioners shall once in a week meet with the Investigating Officer of the case till the report in final form is submitted before the learned jurisdictional court. Additionally, the petitioners shall not enter into the hospital premises without the permission of the local police station. Any violation of the aforesaid conditions, this order will become infructuous. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3021 of 2026 is disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead