Calcutta High Court

CO/3243/2026 of MRINAL SARKAR Vs SANJU ROY on 22 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Ct. No.- 6 Aritra C.O. 3243 of 2026 Mrinal Sarkar Vs. Sanju Roy Mr. Timir Baran Saha ….for the petitioner This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the husband praying for a direction upon the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Tract,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

D/L- 20 22/09/2026 Ct. No.- 6 Aritra C.O. 3243 of 2026

Mrinal Sarkar Vs. Sanju Roy

Mr. Timir Baran Saha ….for the petitioner

This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the husband praying for a direction upon the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Tract, 2nd Court at Krishnagar, District-Nadia to dispose of Matrimonial Suit No.352 of 2022 expeditiously. The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that January 13, 2027 has been fixed for cross- examination of P.W.1. He further submits that the petitioner is paying alimony pendente lite pursuant to the order passed by the court and is not in default in payment of the same. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed there is no necessity to direct issuance of any notice upon the opposite party. However, the learned advocate for the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with this order upon the opposite party or the learned advocate representing the opposite party before the learned trial judge. In the light of the submissions made by the learned advocate for the petitioner, CO 3243 of 2026 stands disposed of by requesting the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Tract, 2nd Court at Krishnagar, District-Nadia

2

to make an endeavour to dispose of the Matrimonial Suit No.352 of 2022 as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided the husband/petitioner is not in default in complying with any direction passed by a competent court of law with regard to the payment of alimony pendente lite or maintenance. There will be no order as to costs. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead