Calcutta High Court
WPCRC/70/2019 of ABHIJIT RAY Vs KHAGENDRANATH ROY AND ORS. on 22 September 2026
D/L. 02 Ct No. 550 (Naba) WPCRC 70 of 2019 in WPA 7966 of 2018 Abhijit Ray Vs. Khagendranath Roy & Anr. Mr. Biswarup Biswas, Mr. Pradip Kumar Ghosh ...for the Petitioner Mrs. Indrani Chakraborty, ld. A.G.P., Mr. Nilanjan Pal ...for the Alleged Contemnor No.1 1. Learned advocate, Mr. Pal,
22.09.2026
D/L. 02
Ct No. 550
(Naba)
WPCRC 70 of 2019
in
WPA 7966 of 2018
Abhijit Ray
Vs.
Khagendranath Roy & Anr.
Mr. Biswarup Biswas,
Mr. Pradip Kumar Ghosh
...for the Petitioner
Mrs. Indrani Chakraborty, ld. A.G.P.,
Mr. Nilanjan Pal
...for the Alleged Contemnor No.1
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned advocate, Mr. Pal, appearing for the State files an affidavit-of-compliance on behalf of the District Inspector of Schools (S.E.), Nadia.
2. The District Inspector of Schools (S.E.), Nadia is personally present before this Court.
3. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Biswas, has submitted that order dated 12.09.2018 passed in WPA 7966 of 2018 has been complied with in its letter and spirit. The petitioner has no objection if the instant contempt proceeding is disposed of.
4. Learned advocate for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court to the page no. 38 of the compliance report which shows that payment date is 16.09.2026.
2
5. As the relevant order has been complied with by filing an affidavit-of-compliance in support of such compliance, there is no need for keeping this contempt proceeding pending.
6. Hence, WPCRC 70 of 2019 stands disposed of.
7. Personal appearance of the District Inspector of Schools (S.E.), Nadia is hereby dispensed with.
8. The Rule issued against the District Inspector of Schools (S.E.), Nadia stands discharged.
(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)