Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1941/2026 of HAFIJUL BHANGI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 22 September 2026
22.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 1941 of 2026 Hafijul Bhangi Vs The State of West Bengal & Anr. In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483
D/L 606
22.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (M) 1941 of 2026
Hafijul Bhangi
Vs
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Garhbeta Police Station Case No. 483 of 2022 dated 08.08.2022 under Sections 363/365/34 and adding Section 376(3) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 6 of the POCSO Act.
And
In the matter of : Hafijul Bhangi
……Petitioner.
Mr. Banshi Badan Maity
…for the Petitioner
Mr. R.R. Mohanty
…for the State
Mr. Arindam Jana
Mr. Rahul Surtani
…for the de facto complainant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate for the petitioner prays for bail of the petitioner.
2. Learned Advocate for the de facto complainant is represented.
3. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
4. I have taken into account the order passed on 10th February, 2026.
5. Having considered that there are no change of circumstances, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
6. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M (M) 1941 of 2026 is dismissed.
7. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)