Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/2998/2026 of FEKON MONDAL AND ANR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No.35. D/L.36. Rakib (Allowed) CRM ( A ) 2998 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with English Bazar Police Station case no. 636 of 2026 dated 26.04.2026 under Sections 103/303(2)/3(5) of the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

21.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.36. Rakib (Allowed)

CRM (A) 2998 of 2026

In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with English Bazar Police Station case no. 636 of 2026 dated 26.04.2026 under Sections 103/303(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

And In the matter of : Fekon Mondal & Anr.

……Petitioners. Mr. Kazi M. Rahman

......for the Petitioners. Mr. Suman Agarwal Mr. Kuntal Roy

……for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submit that petitioner no.1 is the father-in-law of the deceased and petitioner no.2 is the mother-in-law of the deceased who have been foisted with the present criminal case. Charge-sheet has been submitted under Section 108 of the BNS. So far as the wife of the deceased is concerned, she has already been arrested. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and draws the attention of the Court to the materials available in the Case Diary. Having considered the overall circumstances and the locus of the present petitioners, I am of the opinion that custodial detention of the present petitioners is unwarranted in view of that charge-sheet having been submitted before the jurisdictional Court. As such, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners namely, Fekon Mondal and Pratima Mondal is allowed.

2 Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Since, charge-sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional Court this order of anticipatory bail of the petitioners shall remain in force for a period of six weeks from date. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2998 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead