Calcutta High Court
WPA/29825/2024 of TANUSHRI MONDAL Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 21 September 2026
Court No. 24 pg. In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA 29825 of 2024 Tanushri Mondal VS. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Shayak Chakraborty Ms. Sanjukta Majumder … For the petitioner Ms. Sneha Chatterjee … For the State Mr.
21.09.2026
Court No. 24
pg.
In the High Court at Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
WPA 29825 of 2024
Tanushri Mondal
VS.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Shayak Chakraborty
Ms. Sanjukta Majumder
… For the petitioner
Ms. Sneha Chatterjee
… For the State
Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy
… For WBCSSC
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner seeks transfer. The school issued a ‘no objection certificate’ in favour of the teacher in July, 2024. There is nothing on record to suggest that the school issued no objection in the prescribed format submitted by the petitioner seeking transfer. A considerable period of time has been elapsed in the meantime.
2. The instant writ petition is disposed of with the observation that it will be open for the petitioner to make fresh application seeking transfer in the prescribed format disclosing ground for the same.
3. If the online portal is found to be non- functional, then the petitioner will be at liberty to file offline application in the prescribed format.
4. If such application is made, it shall be considered by the authority strictly in accordance with law at the earliest but positively within a period of eight weeks from filing of the application.
5. The fate of the application shall be made known to the petitioner immediately thereafter.
6. If the prayer of the petitioner is allowed, then necessary consequential steps shall be taken by the authority without any further delay.
7. The writ petition stands disposed of.
8. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
9. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)