Calcutta High Court

WPA/25100/2026 of LIC HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AND ANR. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Ct. No.446 Sl. No.7 akd W. P. A . 25100 of 2026 [LIC Housing Finance Limited & Anr. -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.] Mr. Rishabh Dutta Gupta … … for the petitioners Mr. Debashis Karmakar Mr. Arya Nandi Mr. Parikshit Lakhotia … … for respondent nos.5 to

21.09.2026

Ct. No.446

Sl. No.7

akd

W. P. A. 25100 of 2026

[LIC Housing Finance Limited & Anr. -Vs- The State of West Bengal &

Ors.]

Mr. Rishabh Dutta Gupta

… … for the petitioners

Mr. Debashis Karmakar

Mr. Arya Nandi

Mr. Parikshit Lakhotia

… … for respondent nos.5 to 7

Mr. Baidurya Ghosal

Ms. Paramita Mondal

… … for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Affidavit-of-service filed in court today is taken on record.

2. Fundamentally, the present writ petition has been preferred praying for a direction upon the concerned respondent to implement the order of the District Magistrate dated 8th August, 2023, passed under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short, “the SARFAESI Act”). By the said order, one Sri Biswajit Sarkar, WBCS (Exe.), was authorised to take possession of the secured asset and the documents relating thereto and to forward such asset and documents to the secured creditor with police assistance. However, subsequently, Mr. Sarkar was transferred and no person has been deputed in his place, empowering him to execute the order dated 8th August, 2023. In such circumstances, the present writ petition has been preferred.

3. In course of hearing, Mr. Ghosal, learned Advocate appearing for the State/respondents, submits a document wherefrom it appears that one Sri Arnab Saha, WBCS (Exe.), has

2 been appointed to take physical possession of the secured asset and to implement the order dated 8th August, 2023.

4. In view thereof, I am of the view that nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present writ petition and the same is accordingly, disposed of.

5. Since no affidavits have been filed by the respondents, the allegations made in the writ petition shall be deemed to have not been admitted by the respondents.

6. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. Let urgent Photostat certified copy of this order be made available to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of usual formalities.

(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead