Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1881/2026 of XXXXX Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 21 September 2026
Court No.35. D/L. 628. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 1881 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Goghat Police Station Case No. 476 of 2025 dated 22nd October,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
21.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 628. Kausik (Allowed)
CRM (M) 1881 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Goghat Police Station Case No. 476 of 2025 dated 22nd October, 2025, under sections 137(2)/140(3) of the BNS, 2023.
And In the matter of : XXXX
……Petitioner.
Mr. Niladri Sekhar Ghosh
Ms. Labani Sikder
Mr. Soumik Dey
……for the Petitioner.
Mr. Kallol Kr. Basu
Ms. Amit Roy
….for the State.
Report submitted by the State be kept with the record.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner was arrested on 04.02.2026 and since then he is in custody. Charge sheet has already been submitted.
Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
I have taken into account the statement of the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS. Having considered the same, I am of the opinion that further custodial detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted.
2
As such, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, Petitioner shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned ACJM, Arambagh, Hooghly. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of Hooghly without the prior permission of the learned Trial Court.
Additionally, petitioner shall not enter the jurisdiction of Goghat Police Station till the evidence of the vulnerable witnesses are over.
With the aforesaid observations CRM (M) 1881 of 2026 is allowed.
Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)