Calcutta High Court
WPA/28980/2025 of NARAYAN GHOSH AND ANR. Vs FINANCE DEPARTMENT AUDIT BRANCH, GOVT. OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 21 September 2026
2026 Ct. No. 18 Ab WPA 28980 of 2025 Narayan Ghosh and another Vs. Finance Department, Audit Branch, Government of West Bengal and others. --------------- Mr. Pratik Ghosh, Mr. Avishek Roy Chowdhury. … for the petitioners. Mr. PIyush Chaturvedi, Ms. Smita Pal, Mr. Tarun Kumar Jana. …
21.09.
Ct. No. 18
Ab
WPA 28980 of 2025
Narayan Ghosh and another
Vs.
Finance Department, Audit Branch,
Government of West Bengal and others.
---------------
Mr. Pratik Ghosh,
Mr. Avishek Roy Chowdhury.
… for the petitioners.
Mr. PIyush Chaturvedi,
Ms. Smita Pal,
Mr. Tarun Kumar Jana.
… for the State.
Mr. Subir Kumar Bhattacharyya,
Ms. Pinky Dey.
.. for the respondent nos. 3 and 4.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The affidavit of service filed today is taken on records.
2. As prayed for by Mr. Ghosh, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners, leave is granted to correct the cause title of the instant writ petition in course of the day.
3. The application of the petitioners seeking benefits under several Memos and Notifications and particularly, that of Memo No. 1091-F(P2) dated March 1, 2024 has not been considered by the respondent authorities.
4. The petitioners have made representation in respect thereof, which has not been considered by the respondent authorities.
5. In view of the fact that the authorities have not applied themselves to consider the representation of the petitioners, I direct the concerned authorities to dispose of the representation of the petitioners within eight weeks from date in accordance with law.
6. With the afore-stated direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
7. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis.
(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)