Calcutta High Court

WPA/25248/2026 of ABDUL HANNAN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 18 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026 Ct. No. 18 Ab IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 25248 of 2026 Abdul Hannan Vs. The State of West Bengal and others. --------------- Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee, Mr. Kinon Sk., Mr. Sayed Hossain, Mr. Jaminuddin Sk. … for the petitioner. Mr.

18.09.

Ct. No. 18

Ab

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

WPA 25248 of 2026

Abdul Hannan

Vs.

The State of West Bengal and others.

---------------

Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee,

Mr. Kinon Sk.,

Mr. Sayed Hossain,

Mr. Jaminuddin Sk.

… for the petitioner.

Mr. Pulakesh Bajpayee,

Mr. Subit Majumdar.

… for the State.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The affidavit of service filed today is taken on record.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved that his representation of September 8, 2026 has not been considered till date.

3. The petitioner has partaken in the process of recruitment of Constables in the West Bengal Police.

4. Let this writ petition be treated a representation.

5. I direct respondent no. 3 to dispose of the representation of the petitioner by October 10, 2026 by passing a reasoned order thereof, upon giving hearing to the petitioner after giving adequate prior notice. The reasoned order will be communicated to the petitioner within a week thereof.

6. The petitioner will be at liberty to submit all and prevalent notifications and decisions at the time of hearing.

7. I make it clear that this consideration of the representation will not create any right and equity in favour of the petitioner, if he does not have such right in law.

8. With the afore-stated directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

9. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.

10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead